Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1941No. 27900PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Driver, J. —

Felix Arcorace and Joe Coluccio, contractors, completed some sewer construction work for the city of Seattle, and the surety on their bond brought this action to obtain an adjudication of the claims against the retained percentage of their pay. The contractors and their assignee, The National Bank of Commerce of Seattle, cross-complained against the city for additional compensation. The city, by its answer, denied further liability and asserted a counterclaim against the contractors for water, electric power, inspection, and other charges. By stipulation of the parties, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. White v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Gensman v. West Coast Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Modern Builders, Inc. v. MankeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  2. Westland Construction Co. v. Chris Berg, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Walla Walla Port District v. H. G. PalmbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  4. Clark v. City of Humansville, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Dravo Corp. v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API