Legal Opinion

Dravo Corp. v. Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1971No. 40965PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

In response to an advertisement for bids, published by the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, called Metro herein, Dravo Corporation submitted the low bid for the construction of the Enatai interceptor, a sewer pipeline near the East Channel Bridge on the edge of Lake Washington in the city of Bellevue. According to the con tract documents, the sewer was to be laid on hardpan where such hardpan existed at the elevation of the sewer. At other points, where the hardpan lay below the elevation of the sewer, which was designed to allow for gravity flow, the pipe was to be supported on piles…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Lundgren v. KierenWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Valley Construction Co. v. Lake Hills Sewer DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Obray v. MitchellIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Mike M. Johnson, Inc. v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Modern Builders, Inc. v. MankeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. Robert E. McKee, Inc. v. City of AtlantaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1976
  5. Beco Corp. v. Roberts & Sons Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API