Legal Opinion
Garafola v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 20, 2012No. 09 Civ. 10280(JGK)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:
The petitioner, Edward Garafola, appearing pro se, moves pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The petitioner also seeks leave of court to conduct discovery pursuant to Rule 6 of the Rules Governing 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
The petitioner pleaded guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement (the “Plea Agreement”), to participating in the conduct and affairs of a racketeering enterprise — the Gambino Organized Crime Family of La Cosa Nostra — through a pattern of racketeering activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c).…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Petrillo v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
- Lamarco v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- DiTomasso v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Diaz v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Marley v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.