Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Janetsky v. Avis

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1986No. E001432PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HAVENS, J. *

Plaintiff Roger Janetsky (dba Mutual Mortgage Co., and referred to hereafter as plaintiff) appeals from an order denying him relief from default, which occurred when plaintiff failed to respond to a request for admissions, and from the grant of defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

Issues on Appeal

Plaintiff asserts that the issues presented by this appeal are:(1) Were the statutory notice requirements of Code of Civil Procedure section 2033, subdivision (a) complied with by placing the statutory warning regarding failure to respond at the end of the request for admissions…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Elston v. City of TurlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Cramer v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Billings v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Hernandez v. TempleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Steele v. TotahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Lopez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API