Legal Opinion

Godley v. Hackney & Sons

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 15, 1983No. 8210IC1288PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Based upon eight assignments of error, the defendants contend the Commission erred “in altering the deputy commissioner’s findings of fact as to the circumstances surrounding the plaintiffs injury.” Defendants argue that the Commission does not have the authority to amend a deputy commissioner’s findings *158of fact if there is competent evidence in the record to support the deputy commissioner’s findings. We disagree. The Commission’s authority to review deputy commissioner’s awards is granted by N.C. Gen. Stat. Sec. 97-85 which in pertinent part provides:

If application is made to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Watkins v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Robinson v. JP Stevens and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Lee v. F. M. Henderson & AssociatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Apple v. Guilford CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Pittman v. Inco, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Jones v. Baxter International, Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API