Godley v. Hackney & Sons
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Based upon eight assignments of error, the defendants contend the Commission erred “in altering the deputy commissioner’s findings of fact as to the circumstances surrounding the plaintiffs injury.” Defendants argue that the Commission does not have the authority to amend a deputy commissioner’s findings *158of fact if there is competent evidence in the record to support the deputy commissioner’s findings. We disagree. The Commission’s authority to review deputy commissioner’s awards is granted by N.C. Gen. Stat. Sec. 97-85 which in pertinent part provides:
If application is made to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Watkins v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Robinson v. JP Stevens and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Lee v. F. M. Henderson & AssociatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
3Cited by3 opinions
- Apple v. Guilford CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Pittman v. Inco, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Jones v. Baxter International, Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 1998