Legal Opinion

Lane T. Mele v. Fitchburg District Court

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 16, 1989No. 88-2079PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.

Fitchburg District Court (“Fitchburg”) appeals the decision by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, which held that the Massachusetts court had violated the rules established in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969), and therefore vacated Lane Mele’s sentence.

I

In Pearce, the Supreme Court held that a defendant’s due process rights were violated when a judge enhanced a sentence because of vindictiveness after the defendant’s successful appeal. Nevertheless, there exists no constitutional bar to a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Texas v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Walter Dean Waring v. Paul Delo, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center, Missouri Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  2. Oses v. Com. of Mass.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
  3. Robert C. Hurlburt v. Michael J. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. Fleet Bank of Massachusetts v. Lavita (In Re Lavita)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
  5. Daughtry v. DennehyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API