Legal Opinion
Consolidated Television Cable Service, Inc. v. City of Frankfort
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 21, 1988No. 87-5539PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILMORE, District Judge.
In this action, plaintiff Consolidated Television Cable Service, Inc. (Consolidated), a private for-profit corporation engaged in the business of providing cable television (CATV) service for the City of Frankfort, Kentucky, alleges that defendants, The City of Frankfort (City); Electric and Water Plant Board of the City of Frankfort, Kentucky, (Board), and Community Service, Inc. (Community), have violated the Federal Anti-Trust Laws and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The antitrust claim is essentially that defendants have unlawfully conspired to prevent free competition between…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Town of Hallie v. City of Eau ClaireSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Michigan Paytel Joint Venture v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Muellner v. Mars, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Michigan Paytel Joint Venture v. City Of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Lender's Service, Inc. v. Dayton Bar Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.