Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Taber

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 29, 2012No. 105,922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Arnold-Burger, J.;

James L. Taber was in arrears on his child support payments when he received a favorable ruling on his request for Social Security disability insurance (SSDI) benefits. Because SSDI benefits were retroactive, both Taber and his minor child, G.T., received lump-sum payments to cover the back benefits. G.T. was already receiving monthly Supplemental Security income (SSI) due to his own medical condition. G.T/s SSDI lump-sum award was reduced by the amount of SSI benefits he received *842during the same time frame. Taber filed a motion asking the district court to apply G.T.’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BerriozabalSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. Andler v. AndlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. Marriage of Holmberg v. HolmbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Newman v. NewmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  5. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Marriage of Stephenson & PapineauSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. In re the Marriage of StephensonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
  3. In re Marriage of ScottCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  4. In re the Marriage of StephensonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
  5. State v. DeLaONew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API