In re the Marriage of Taber
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Arnold-Burger, J.;
James L. Taber was in arrears on his child support payments when he received a favorable ruling on his request for Social Security disability insurance (SSDI) benefits. Because SSDI benefits were retroactive, both Taber and his minor child, G.T., received lump-sum payments to cover the back benefits. G.T. was already receiving monthly Supplemental Security income (SSI) due to his own medical condition. G.T/s SSDI lump-sum award was reduced by the amount of SSI benefits he received *842during the same time frame. Taber filed a motion asking the district court to apply G.T.’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. BerriozabalSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Andler v. AndlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Marriage of Holmberg v. HolmbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Newman v. NewmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Marriage of Stephenson & PapineauSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- In re the Marriage of StephensonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
- In re Marriage of ScottCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
- In re the Marriage of StephensonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
- State v. DeLaONew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2022