Legal Opinion

Newman v. Newman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 21, 1990No. 88-1676PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMAN, Justice.

This appeal arises from a declaratory judgment action that posed one question: Should a custodial parent be required, on a theory of unjust enrichment, to pay restitution to a disabled noncustodial parent for social security dependent benefits which exceeded the amount of court-ordered child support? We think not, and therefore reverse the district court’s contrary ruling.

The facts giving rise to this controversy are not disputed. The marriage of Ralph and Cheryl Newman was dissolved in 1977. Cheryl was awarded custody of the parties’ sons, Ronald and Larry. Ralph was ordered…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Andler v. AndlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. Children & Youth Services of Allegheny County v. ChorgoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Potts v. PottsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  4. McClaskey v. McClaskeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Norton v. Adair CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hinckley v. HinckleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  3. In Re Marriage of CowanMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Pontbriand v. PontbriandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
  5. Gress v. GressNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API