Legal Opinion
Phillip Carnes Jennifer Carnes Kathryn Schaller Kevin Schaller H. Gene Carnes v. Michael A. Zamani Nancy Zamani
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 4, 2007No. 05-15084PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, District Judge.
Appellants Phillip Carnes, Jennifer Carnes, Kathryn Schaller, Kevin Schaller, and H. Gene Carnes (“the Carneses”) appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for attorney fees and costs incurred in enforcing a judgment in their favor against appellees Michael A. and Nancy Zamani (“the Zamanis”). This appeal raises the question of whether Rule 69(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure applies to a motion for post-judgment attorney fees, and if so, whether under California law, the Carneses’ fee motion was untimely. The district court held that Rule 69(a)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Morris Johnson, Jr. v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, Lp, Morris Johnson, Jr. v. Columbia Properties Anchorage, LpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- In Re Larry's ApartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Frances Duchek and Arthur Duchek v. Rudolph Jacobi and Elfi JacobiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Zamani v. CarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Zamani v. CarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Riordan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Psm Holding Corp. v. National Farm Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Lucky United Properties Investment, Inc. v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.