Legal Opinion

Application of Stephane Dufaure De Lajarte

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 5, 1964No. Patent Appeal 7237PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMOND, Judge.

Stephane Dufaure De Lajarte appeals from a decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of all of the claims in appellant’s application 1 for a glass composition.

The rejected claims 5 and 11 read as follows:

“5. Electrically insulating glass having a composition consisting essentially of the following constituents in per cent by weight

Si02 66.8

B2O3

AI2O3 3.0

Fe203 1.6

MnO 0.6

CaO 9

MgO 4

BaO 3

Na20 8

K2O 4

said glass having resistance to perforation equivalent to at least about 36 KV in a plate 500 x 500 x 7 mm., at 200° C., under 50 cycle alternating current.

“11.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Application of SelmiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  2. In re BourdonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  3. In re GreiderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  4. Application of Bhogaraju v. Janakirama-RaoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  5. In re BrittonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Patents v. Deutsche Gold-Und-Silber-Scheideanstalt Vormals RoesslerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Application of John R. StemniskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  3. Deutsche Goed-Und Sieber-Scheideanstalt v. Commissioner of PatentsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
  4. In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. Commissioner of Patents v. Deutsche Gold-Und-Silber-Scheideanstalt Vormals RoesslerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API