Legal Opinion

Application of Bhogaraju v. Janakirama-Rao

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 10, 1963No. Patent Appeal 6997PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 10 and 11 of application Ser. No. 534,529, filed September 15, 1955, for “Cadmium-Bismuth Glasses.”

Appellant’s specification shows that his glasses are composed of three primary constituents: a cadmium compound (e. g., cadmium oxide, CdO); a bismuth compound (e. g., bismuth oxide, BÍ2O3); and a network former (e. g., silica, SÍO2). A modifier (e. g., tungsten oxide, WO3) may also be used if desired.

The significance of the cadmium compound, appellant’s application…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Atlas Powder Company v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company and Alamo Explosives Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Ak Steel Corporation v. Sollac and Ugine, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  3. Boeing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Application of Stephane Dufaure De LajarteCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  5. In re HerzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API