ZD Howard Company v. Cartwright
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Vice Chief Justice.
The question presented by this appeal is whether exemplary damages are allowable under Appellant’s cross-petition.
Appellee contends that Appellant’s cross-petition is nothing more than an action for breach of a contract, and cites the general rule, supportive by our statute, 23 O.S.1971 § 9, that exemplary damages are not recoverable in action arising from contract.
Appellants counter that their cross-petition is based upon an action in fraud; therefore, the action sounds in tort, and punitive damages are recoverable.
The facts leading to this confrontation arise out…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Sellinger v. Freeway Mobile Home Sales, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1974
- Ray Dodge, Inc. v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Boise Dodge, Inc. v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Hobbs v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Okland Oil Company v. Conoco Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Linscott v. Rainier National Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- LeFlore v. Reflections of Tulsa, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Black v. GardnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Mortgage Finance, Inc. v. PodleskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.