Legal Opinion
Trees v. City of Lafayette
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided October 23, 2018No. A154168PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtPollak, J.
*224Petitioners Save Lafayette Trees, Michael Dawson and David Kosters (collectively Save Lafayette Trees) appeal an order sustaining without leave to amend a demurrer to their petition for writ of mandate challenging the City of Lafayette's (city) approval of a Letter of Agreement for Tree Removal (agreement) with real party in interest Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E). Save Lafayette Trees contends the trial court erred in concluding that service of its petition for a writ of mandate was untimely under Government Code 1 section 65009. While we agree with the trial court that the claims…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Travis v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Honig v. San Francisco Planning DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Committee for a Progressive Gilroy v. State Water Resouces Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.