Legal Opinion
Save Lafayette Trees v. City of Lafayette
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided February 8, 2019No. A154168PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pollak, J.*
*152Petitioners Save Lafayette Trees, Michael Dawson, and David Kosters (collectively Save Lafayette Trees) appeal an order sustaining without leave to amend a demurrer to their petition for writ of mandate challenging the City of Lafayette's (city) approval of a letter of agreement for tree removal (agreement) with real party in interest Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E). Save Lafayette Trees contends the trial court erred in concluding that service of its petition for a writ of mandate was untimely under Government Code1 section 65009. In an opinion filed on October 23, 2018,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Travis v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Honig v. San Francisco Planning DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Committee for a Progressive Gilroy v. State Water Resouces Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Doe v. BlackDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Elevations Plus, LLC. v. City Council of RiverbankDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Save Lafayette Trees v. East Bay Regional Park Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Weiss v. City of Del MarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019