Legal Opinion

D'Ambrosio v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 9, 1946No. Appeals, 68 and 69PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

Plaintiffs sued for themselves and their minor son to recover for injuries sustained by the son who was thrown from the rear of a motor truck as it passed over a hole in a city street. After verdicts for the plaintiffs, they moved for a new trial on the ground of inadequacy, and the city moved for judgment n. o. v. A new trial was granted. The city’s motion for judgment was refused and these appeals followed.

The minor plaintiff, 12 years and 8 months of age, with three other boys, boarded the rear of a motor truck moving south on Lawrence Street toward Erie Avenue…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jinks v. CurrieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Elkins's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Lane v. E. A. Mullen, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Purol, Inc. v. Great Eastern System, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Way v. HootonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Bauman v. CrawfordWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Stanton v. Astra Pharmaceutical ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. Stanton v. Astra Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. MOUNT v. BulifantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API