Bauman v. Crawford
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.
This appeal requires us to decide whether the negligence per se doctrine should be applicable to minors, or whether minors should instead be judged only by the special child's standard of care in a civil negligence action. We hold that a minor's violation of a statute does not constitute proof of negligence per se, but may, in proper cases, be introduced as evidence of a minor's negligence. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Bauman v. Crawford, 38 Wn. App. 301, 685 P.2d 1104 (1984).
On April 24, 1979, at approximately 9:30 p.m., the bicycle ridden by petitioner…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Rosenau Ex Rel. Rosenau v. City of EsthervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Young v. Caravan CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Rudes v. GottschalkTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- In re the Personal Restraint of Langhout-NixWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- McCurdy v. Union Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1966
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Hansen v. FriendWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Scott v. Pacific West Mountain ResortWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Owen v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe RR Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Owen v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Baughn v. Honda Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.