Bristow v. Carrigar
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Qourt, Coal County; A. T. West, Judge. Action by J. W. Carrigar and another against A. J. Bris-tow and another to recover damages on replevin bond. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROBERTSON, C.
This is an action to recover damages on a replevin bond. It appears from the record that Bristow and the Carrigars were having trouble over the possession of a certain tract of land, together with the crops growing thereon, during the year 1904; that Bristow, in September, 1905, -brought an action in replevin against the Car- rigars before a United States Commissioner at Atoka, and sought thereby to recover a quantity of corn that had been grown 'by the Carrigars . on the land in dispute; that on the day set for trial of the replevin action before the United States…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bristow v. CarrigarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Bristow v. CarrigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Bristow v. CarrigarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
3Cited by3 opinions
- Myers v. CabinessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Stekoll v. LebowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- McCuiston v. ChristianSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946