Myers v. Cabiness
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Custer County; Replevin by Hardin Myers against W. F. Cabiness. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
GALBRAITH, C.
This action, arose out of a disagreement as to the ownership and right to the possession of “a certain hog, about eight or nine months old, black and white spotted, weight about ■ 150 pounds, and of the value of $12.” There has been three jury trials in the case, one before a justice of the peace, and two in the county court on appeal; the last trial resulting in a verdict for the defendant. From the judgment rendered upon this verdict, the plaintiff appeals.
The principal error relied upon is the action of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial. The first…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bristow v. CarrigarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
3Cited by7 opinions
- Garland Coal & Mining Co. v. FewCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Stekoll v. LebowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Fullerton-Stuart Lumber Co. v. BadgerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Barry v. KniseleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Garland Coal & Mining Company v. Clifton FewCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.