Legal Opinion

Bristow v. Carrigar

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 6, 1913No. 2728PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error, from District Court, Coal County; A. T. West, Judge. Action by A. J. Bristow against J. W. Carrigar and another. Judgement for defendants, -and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

The only question presented by this appeal that requires consideration at our hands is' whether or not the trial court erred in entering a, certain nunc pro tunc order on September 21, 1910, over the objections of plaintiff, in error. To properly answer this question a brief review of the case becomes necessary.

On August 6, 1904) plaintiff in error, A. J. Bristow, secured a lease for certain. agricultural lands in the Choctaw Nation from the allottee, N. T. Tiner. This lease was recorded August 10, 1904. Prior to. the execution of this lease, and on February 11, 1904,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bristow v. CarrigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mooney v. First State Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Bristow v. CarrigarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Britt v. Doty, Adm'xSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Bristow v. CarrigarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API