Ex Parte Terry
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
Under the provisions of our Workmen’s Compensation Act “personal injuries * * * arising out of and in the course of his [the workman’s] employment” do not include “an injury caused by the act of a third person or fellow employé intended to injure the employé because of reasons personal to him, and not directed against .him as an employé, or because of his employment.” Gen. Acts 1919, p. 238, § 36 (2) (J).
The only controverted question in the instant case is whether the injuries suffered by the plaintiff — knife wounds inflicted upon him by Elbert Wallace in the course of a felonious assault…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Duluth Brewing & Malting Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Ex Parte Majestic Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
3Cited by27 opinions
- Mobile Liners, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Riley v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Jett v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Benoit Coal Mining Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Dean v. Stockham Pipe & Fittings Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.