Hall v. Wright
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action is for specific performance of a written contract for. the purchase of a tract of land in Sonoma county. The facts are not disputed and the only question of law presented is, as agreed by counsel, “whether or not the plaintiffs have a present title in fee in the lands involved which they can convey by deed to the defendant. ” It is stipulated that on the twentieth day of April, 1883, W. S. M. Wright was the owner in fee of the premises, and on that day he executed a deed thereof to Mrs. M. 0. Hall “for the natural life of the said party of the second part, and then to the heirs of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- County of Los Angeles v. WinansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
3Cited by13 opinions
- Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Bank of Italy v. NewmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Brownell v. GebhardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Miller v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Estate of J. S. Ferry v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.