Legal Opinion

Hall v. Wright

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1911No. Civ. No. 874PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The action is for specific performance of a written contract for. the purchase of a tract of land in Sonoma county. The facts are not disputed and the only question of law presented is, as agreed by counsel, “whether or not the plaintiffs have a present title in fee in the lands involved which they can convey by deed to the defendant. ” It is stipulated that on the twentieth day of April, 1883, W. S. M. Wright was the owner in fee of the premises, and on that day he executed a deed thereof to Mrs. M. 0. Hall “for the natural life of the said party of the second part, and then to the heirs of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. County of Los Angeles v. WinansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Bank of Italy v. NewmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Brownell v. GebhardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Miller v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Estate of J. S. Ferry v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API