Legal Opinion
Boehringer Ingelheim G.M.B.H. v. Pharmadyne Laboratories
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 24, 1980No. Civ. 79-738PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LACEY, District Judge.
THE COURT: In these consolidated actions plaintiffs charged the defendants with patent infringement and unfair competition. The patent issues were resolved by a consent judgment entered against the defendants. Plaintiffs’ claims that defendants violated § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and the New Jersey law of unfair competition, were tried before the court without a jury. The following constitutes my findings of fact and conclusions of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 52.
THE PARTIES
The Plaintiffs
The plaintiffs in both actions are Boehringer G.m.b.H.,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Amstar Corporation v. Domino's Pizza, Inc. And Atlanta Pizza, Inc., Pizza Enterprises, Inc. And Pizza Services, Inc., Hanna Creative Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, Inc. v. Pussycat Cinema, Ltd. And Michael ZaffaranoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ciba-Geigy Corporation v. Bolar Pharmaceutical Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Eli Lilly and Co. v. Roussel Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Shire US Inc. v. Barr Laboratories Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- National Football League Properties, Inc. v. New Jersey Giants, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
- Eagle Snacks, Inc. v. Nabisco Brands, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.