Legal Opinion

Eklund v. Eklund

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 1946No. Civ. 13108PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This action to impress a lien for premiums advanced on a combination of five life insurance policies, was instituted by Dorothea G. Eklund, the mother of Maxine D. Hawke, who married Charles E. Hawke prior to the filing of the complaint. O. E. Eklund, the second named plaintiff, is the husband of Dorothea G. Eklund and the stepfather of Maxine.

The respective dates of issuance and the principals of the policies, as set forth by respondents, are as follows: (1) April 4,1927, 20-year endowment, $184; (2 and 3) January 12,1931, two 20-year endowment, $450 each; (4) August 11, 1930, 20-year…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crane v. DerrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Ruble v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Lynch v. LynchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Friermuth v. FriermuthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Stockwell v. Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shurrum v. WattsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Jaffe v. CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Hamilton v. CaplanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. Johnson v. ServaesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Petersen v. LangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API