Union Pacific Railroad v. Trona Valley Federal Credit Union
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Union Pacific Railroad (Union Pacific) appeals a district court judgment that it improperly calculated the amount to be withheld from an employee’s paycheck to satisfy a judgment debt by failing to deduct a child support garnishment when determining disposable earnings. Union Pacific contends that deducting the child support garnishment would result in a violation of the Consumer Protection Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1671 through 1677, and Wyoming law. We agree and reverse.
ISSUES
[¶ 2] Union Pacific sets forth the following statement of the issues:
1. Whether a person who is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Parker v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Motor Vehicle Division v. HoltzWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Mekss v. Wyoming Girls' SchoolWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Schulthess v. CarolloWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Rennard v. VollmarWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Parkhurst v. BoykinWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Keats v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Pedro/Aspen, Ltd. v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Brown v. Arp and Hammond Hardware CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.