Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad v. Trona Valley Federal Credit Union

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 2002No. 01-263PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Union Pacific Railroad (Union Pacific) appeals a district court judgment that it improperly calculated the amount to be withheld from an employee’s paycheck to satisfy a judgment debt by failing to deduct a child support garnishment when determining disposable earnings. Union Pacific contends that deducting the child support garnishment would result in a violation of the Consumer Protection Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1671 through 1677, and Wyoming law. We agree and reverse.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] Union Pacific sets forth the following statement of the issues:

1. Whether a person who is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Parker v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State Ex Rel. Motor Vehicle Division v. HoltzWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Mekss v. Wyoming Girls' SchoolWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Schulthess v. CarolloWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Rennard v. VollmarWyoming Supreme Court · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Parkhurst v. BoykinWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Keats v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Pedro/Aspen, Ltd. v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Brown v. Arp and Hammond Hardware CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API