Legal Opinion

Bihn v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 10, 1946No. 675Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

328 U.S. 633 (1946)

BIHN

v.

UNITED STATES.

No. 675.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued March 26, 1946.

Decided June 10, 1946.

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

Henry K. Chapman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was David V. Cahill.

John J. Cooney argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General McGrath, Robert S. Erdahl and Leon Ulman.

2Opinion of the Court · DouglasJustice Douglas

Petitioner and one Bennett were convicted of a conspiracy[1] to violate the statute and regulationr governing the rationing of gasoline.[2] It was charged that between July 1,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. McCandless v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API