Legal Opinion
State v. Veale
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 19, 2007No. 2006-043PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGalway, J.
The appellate defender has moved to withdraw from representing the defendant, Scott W. Veale, in this matter due to an alleged conflict of interest. For the reasons that follow, we deny the motion without prejudice, and remand in part.
The following facts are not disputed. In June 2003, the defendant was indicted for one count of timber trespass contrary to RSA chapter 227-J (2000 & Supp. 2003) and one count of theft by unauthorized taking contrary to RSA 637:3 (1996). Prior to his trial on those charges, the defendant’s court-appointed public defender moved for, and was granted, a competency…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. LentzOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Cannon v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- People v. BanksIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Asch v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- McCall v. District Court for the Twenty-First Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. EtienneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. VealeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. PepinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Nelson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.