Legal Opinion
State v. Etienne
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 21, 2011No. Nos. 2004-833; 2006-919PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConboy, J.
The defendant, Dickens Etienne, appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for the first-degree murder of Larry Lemieux. See RSA 630:l-a, 1(a) (1996 & Supp. 2005). On appeal, he argues that the Superior Court {Barry, J.) erred by: (1) incorrectly defining the elements *65of self-defense or defense of another in its jury instructions; (2) permitting hearsay testimony; (3) failing to order a new trial based upon perjured testimony of a State’s witness and the State’s failure to disclose exculpatory information; and (4) failing to order the State to immunize a witness for the purpose of…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. NoucasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- State v. AddisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- State v. GuaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. FurgalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.