Legal Opinion

McCall v. District Court for the Twenty-First Judicial District

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 4, 1989No. 89SA76PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr

In this original proceeding under C.A.R. 21, we issued a rule directing the respondent, Mesa County District Court, 1 to show cause why the Colorado State Public Defender should not be permitted to withdraw from representing defendant Donnie Ray McCall on appeal from the denial of his motion for post-conviction review of a judgment and sentence for second-degree murder. The public defender had moved to withdraw based upon a conflict of interest. The asserted conflict arose because McCall’s pro se motion for post-conviction review alleged ineffective assistance of counsel in the district court…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. People v. BothamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Rodriguez v. District Court for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  4. In the Interest of ClintonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. Angarano v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Eriks v. DenverWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. GarrettWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. King v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. District Court of El Paso CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. People v. HarlanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API