Opinion of the Justices
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
To the Honorable Senate:
The undersigned, the justices of the supreme court, answer your inquiry relative to Senate Bill No. 37 as follows:
The commission proposed by the bill is intended to be an executive tribunal, and not a court within the judiciary department of the state government. The bill proposes to confer upon the commission power to adjudicate certain disputes of a legal character between individuals. A question arises whether such power may be thus vested constitutionally.
Article 37 of the bill of rights in the state constitution declares that the powers of the three branches of…
2Cited by37 opinions
- Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- David v. Vesta Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- McHugh v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Trybulski v. Bellows Falls Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- Mallatt v. LUIHNOregon Supreme Court · 1956
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.