Coit & Co. v. Sutton
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiff, a corporation of the state of *326Illinois, recovered a judgment in the Wayne county circuit court, from which the defendant appeals.
The findings of fact show that plaintiff was engaged in the business of shipping from Illinois goods manufactured in that state, to its customers in Michigan, on orders given it by mail, or taken by its agents in Michigan; that on January 23, 1894, the plaintiff, through its duly-authorized agent, entered into a written contract with the defendant, in the city of Detroit, Mich., for the sale to him of a quantity of white lead at a specified price, to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Welton v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
3Cited by36 opinions
- Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Union Steam Pump Sales Co. v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Oakland Sugar Mill Co. v. Fred W. Wolf Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
- Vaughn Machine Co. v. LighthouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Harrell v. Peters Cartridge Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.