Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 18, 2003No. 2002-146PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.

The defendant, Gregory Davis, appeals his conviction of two counts of being a felon in possession of a dangerous weapon, see RSA 159:3 (1994) (amended 2001), arguing that the Superior Court (Coffey, J.) erred in failing to suppress evidence and dismiss all indictments for lack of specificity. We affirm.

The trial court found the following relevant facts for purposes of ruling on the defendant’s motion to suppress. Some time prior to June 12, 1999, an informant notified the Salem Police Department that illegal goods, including pornography, mace, pepper spray, stun guns and illegal knives, were…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  3. State v. ChickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  4. State v. FortierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  5. State v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. EricsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  2. State v. SleeperSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  3. State v. BellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  4. State v. Daniel Jesus CoraSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
  5. State v. De La CruzSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API