Legal Opinion
State v. De La Cruz
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 9, 2009No. 2008-328PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The defendant, Nilson De La Cruz, appeals his conviction in the Superior Court (Nadeau, J.) for operating a motor vehicle after having been certified as a habitual offender. See RSA 262:23 (Supp. 2008). The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirm.
The parties stipulated to, or the record supports, the following facts. The defendant was certified as a habitual offender in May 2004, and his driving privileges were revoked for a minimum of four years. On August 24, 2007, he was driving a sport utility vehicle (SUV) through a parking lot…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. JoyceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- State v. LantagneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- State of New Hampshire v. Hillman Blesdell-MooreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- State v. MosconeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State of New Hampshire v. Hillman Blesdell-MooreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.