Legal Opinion
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 15, 1994No. 88 Civ. 4486 (DNE)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, Senior District Judge:
This opinion emanates from the voluntary settlement of an action commenced by plaintiff, United States of America, against defendants, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“the IBT” or “the Union”) and the IBT’s General Executive Board. This settlement was embodied in the voluntary consent order entered March 14, 1989 (“the Consent Decree”). Among other things, the Consent Decree provides for the creation of the Independent Review Board (“the IRB”). The IRB is responsible for investigating allegations of corruption within the Union. As…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Application of the United States of America in the Matter of an Order Authorizing the Use of a Pen Register or Similar Mechanical DeviceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Georgopoulos v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Erbacci, Cerone, and Moriarty, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.