Legal Opinion

Dunbar v. O'Brien

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1928No. 26005PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is a suit in equity to abate a private nuisance and to protect an easement. Ruth F. Dunbar, plaintiff, owns a lot fronting south on First avenue in Nebraska City. Joseph O’Brien, defendant, owns the adjoining lot on the west. The west wall or the eaves of the house in which plaintiff resides with her family are on the west line of her lot. The east wall of defendant’s house is perhaps eight *246feet farther west. Neither party disputes the title to the lot of the other. The petition contains pleas that defendant piled old lumber and other debris close to the west wall of plaintiff’s house in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Flaherty v. MoranMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Omaha & Republican Valley Railway Co. v. RickardsNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Norton v. RandolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Bush v. MockettNebraska Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Romans v. NadlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Spenard Action Committee v. Lot 3, Block 1, Evergreen SubdivisionAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Jurgensen v. AinscowNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Cohen Et Ux. v. Perrino Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Hopkins v. HillNebraska Supreme Court · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API