Higgins Erectors & Haulers, Inc. v. E.E. Austin & Son, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERALD J. WEBER, District Judge.
We are herein confronted with a classic example of what is commonly referred to as “passing the buck.” The particular “buck” with which we are concerned has been passed no less than seven times. The opportunity has now come for us to step in and determine where the buck stops.
I. Facts
The basic facts upon which these cases arise are fairly simple, and begin in May, 1984. Hammermill Paper Company selected E.E. Austin & Sons, Inc. as the prime contractor for some construction work in Erie, Pennsylvania. E.E. Austin in turn subcontracted some of the work out…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Kassab v. SoyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- SPIRES Et Ux. v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Lasprogata v. QuallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Manor Junior College v. Kaller's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richardson v. John F. Kennedy Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- University Patents, Inc. v. KligmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- EQT Production Co. v. Terra Services, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Dunn v. PraissNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- BAUM v. SCHLESINGERDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023