Legal Opinion

Swartz v. White

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1932No. 4988PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFolland, J.

This is an action in claim and delivery for repossession of a Buick roadster automobile, 1924 Model, Serial No. 110376, Motor No. 1143291. Plaintiff had judgment for the car or in case delivery thereof could not be had then for the sum of $250, its value, and for costs. Defendant appeals and assigns numerous errors. The district court made a finding of fact that plaintiff is and was at the time of the commencement of the action the owner and entitled to the possession of the automobile in question. Appellant contends this finding is not supported by the evidence and assigns error in that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Parke v. FranciscusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Briedwell v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Harrison v. Auto Securities Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Jones v. Commercial Investment TrustUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Olsen v. Legal Adjustment Bureau, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. GallOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Karibian v. PalettaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Snyder v. LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Jackson v. JamesUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  5. A. C. Nelsen Auto Sales, Inc. v. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API