Legal Opinion

A. C. Nelsen Auto Sales, Inc. v. Turner

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 19, 1950No. 47629PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMantz, J.

Plaintiff’s suit is in replevin to secure possession of a certain Packard automobile which it claims to have purchased from an agent of defendant, alleging that it is an innocent purchaser thereof and that defendant is estopped to dispute such claim. This claim of plaintiff is denied by the defendant, who alleges that the purported sale to plaintiff was ineffective to divest the defendant of his title in and to said •vehicle. The court tried the case without a jury and found for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

I. There is little dispute as to the facts in this case. In its findings of fact…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Cashin v. PliterMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State Ex Rel. Connecticut Fire Insurance v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  3. People's Trust Co. v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Sillyman v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  5. Endres v. Mara-Rickenbacker Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Turner v. Zip Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  2. Ver Steegh v. FlaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  3. Stauter v. Walnut Grove ProductsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  4. Hawkins v. M & J FINANCE CORP.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Arenson v. ButterworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API