Legal Opinion
Ollar-Robinson Co. v. O'Neill
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 3, 1914No. 11985PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered November 6, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contracts.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
The respondents have moved to dismiss this appeal for the reason that the appellants failed to prepare and serve upon the respondents or counsel for the respondents any abstract of the record at or before the time of serving their opening brief, as provided by Laws of 1913, ch. 116, *2p. 349, § 1 (3 Rem. & Bal. Code, § 1730-1). That section reads as follows:
“The appellant shall, at or before the time when he is required by rule or statute to serve his opening brief, cause to be typewritten and served upon the opposite party an abstract of so much of the record and statement of facts as he may…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Whiting v. Big River Lead Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Files v. TebbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Thuet v. StrongNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- Spedden v. SykesWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Michaelson v. OvermeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Whittlesey v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Brown v. BaldwinWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- City of Spokane v. CostelloWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Silvain v. BensonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Caldwell v. KlyceWashington Supreme Court · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.