Legal Opinion

Local 4501, Communications Workers of America v. Ohio State University

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1986No. 85-696PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The propositions of law advanced by the parties effectively can be reduced to two general issues. The first issue before the court is whether the trial court erred in permitting the university’s custodial service contracts to be “performed according to their terms.” C.W.A. argues that the trial court failed to abide by the “law of the case” doctrine when, on remand of the instant case, it declined to terminate the service contracts that were found by this court to have been let out in a manner that was contrary to Ohio law. We find that C.W.A.’s argument has merit.

The plain import of this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Dayton Classroom Teachers Ass'n v. Dayton Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State ex rel. Sigall v. Aetna Cleaning Contractors of Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jurcisin v. Cuyahoga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Rollins v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Mayfield Heights Fire Fighters Ass'n v. DeJohnOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Carter v. Ohio Department of HealthOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. DeCrane v. City of WestlakeOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API