Legal Opinion

Carter v. Ohio Department of Health

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1986No. 86-395PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The primary issue presented in this appeal is whether ODH had authority to abolish appellees’ positions and enter into a contract with a private firm to perform the services previously performed by the appellees. We hold in the affirmative and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

From the outset of this controversy, ODH has maintained that its decision to abolish a number of positions within the data services unit and to contract out the data entry services was “for reasons of economy.” ODH *464argues that R.C. 124.321(D) clearly authorizes the abolishment of the positions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sigall v. Aetna Cleaning Contractors of Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Local 4501, Communications Workers of America v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Local 4501, Communications Workers of America v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Professional Engineers v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Vermont State Employees' Ass'n v. Vermont Criminal Justice Training CouncilSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  3. Moore v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Cincinnati Golf Management, Inc. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. McAlpin v. ShireyOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API