Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 19, 1934No. 4979PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPARKS, Circuit Judge.

Appellee filed its hill in equity to rescind for fraud the reinstatement of a policy of life insurance. A jury trial was had, but at the close of the evidence, upon motion of appellee for a decree in its behalf, and a similar motion on the part of appellant for a decree in behalf of herself, the court discharged the jury and rendered a decree in favor of ap-pellee, holding the reinstatement void and enjoining appellant from prosecuting any action under the policy. Appellant appeals from that decree.

The principal errors relied upon by appellant have to do with the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hilton-GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Walters v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Williams v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Co-Efficient Foundation, Inc. v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  2. Provident Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  3. Hesselberg v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  4. Halverson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  5. Rosenthal v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API