Rogers v. Highland
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Guthrie Circuit Court. Action by attachment, in which two colts were levied-upon as the property of defendant. Mount intervened, claiming the colts under two mortgages executed to him by the defendant.' A demurrer to the petition of intervention was sustained. The intervenor appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
I. The animals seized under the attachment were two sucking colts, two and three months old respectively. The intervenor alleges in his petition that before the colts were foaled the defendant executed to him two chattel mortgages upon the dams of the colts, which had been duly recorded, and that the colts were sucklings, of the age of two and three months, respectively, when the attachment was levied upon them, and were, at the time of the levy, in the possession of defendant. The intervenor also alleges that before the levy he notified plaintiffs of his mortgages, and his rights thereunder.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thomas v. HillhouseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- Kellogg v. LovelyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Forman v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1848
- Funk v. PaulWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- Fowler v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- First National Bank v. EichmeierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Shoobert v. De MottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Demers v. GrahamMontana Supreme Court · 1907
- Holt v. LucasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Strong v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.