Legal Opinion
City of Moultrie v. Cook
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 9, 1912No. 4207PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Action for damages; from city court of Moultrie — Judge Thomas presiding. April 30, 1912.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.
1. A ground of a motion for a new trial assigning error in, permitting a witness to answer a certain question, which does not disclose the answer objected to, presents no question for determination. Southern Ry. Co. v. Wright, 6 Ga. App. 175 (64 S. E. 703); Smith v. State, 119 Ga. 113 (46 S. E. 79).
2. The trial court did not err in permitting the plaintiff to testify as to the fact and the extent of a previous injury, the instant suit involving the claim that the previous injury had been aggravated by the tort for which redress was sought. “Wrongfully to cause, aggravate, or protract illness…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Georgia Northern Railway Co. v. Hutchins & JenkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Merchants & Miners Transportation Co. v. CorcoranCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Southern Railway Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Bray v. LathamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
3Cited by3 opinions
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. SarmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- City of Atlanta v. GoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Casteel v. Allgood-Frey-Shaw Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923