Antill v. Sigman
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Chief Justice.
The appellant and the appellee are adjoining property owners in a residential subdivision. The developer-common grantor placed certain protective covenants on the property restricting the use thereof. Each home was surrounded by a walled enclosure and that part of each owner’s property to the rear and outside the walled enclosure was to be maintained in a natural state. Paragraph 16 of the protective covenants provided in part: "This area shall not be fenced or cross-fenced, and no playground equipment or other temporary or permanent improvement permitted.”
Paragraph 18…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wardlaw v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Dooley v. Savannah Bank Trust CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Kilby v. SawtellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- McKinnon v. NeugentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- M. M. G. Development Co. v. HoustonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rice v. Lost Mountain Homeowners Assoc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Bryan v. MBC Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Roth v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Duffy v. Landings Association, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Municipal Electric Authority v. 2100 Riveredge Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986