Legal Opinion

Antill v. Sigman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 6, 1978No. 32922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Chief Justice.

The appellant and the appellee are adjoining property owners in a residential subdivision. The developer-common grantor placed certain protective covenants on the property restricting the use thereof. Each home was surrounded by a walled enclosure and that part of each owner’s property to the rear and outside the walled enclosure was to be maintained in a natural state. Paragraph 16 of the protective covenants provided in part: "This area shall not be fenced or cross-fenced, and no playground equipment or other temporary or permanent improvement permitted.”

Paragraph 18…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wardlaw v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Dooley v. Savannah Bank Trust CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  3. Kilby v. SawtellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  4. McKinnon v. NeugentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  5. M. M. G. Development Co. v. HoustonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rice v. Lost Mountain Homeowners Assoc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  2. Bryan v. MBC Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Roth v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Duffy v. Landings Association, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Municipal Electric Authority v. 2100 Riveredge Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API