State v. Oakley
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brister
Since a constitutional amendment in 1956, 1 the Legislature has enacted a number of statutes providing compensation for persons wrongfully imprisoned by the State. The current version is Chapter 103 of the Civil Practices and Remedies Code. 2 That Chapter allows either administrative or judicial claims, 3 the former providing a flat $25,000 per year of wrongful imprisonment, 4 the latter providing reimbursement of actual lost earnings, medical expenses, and legal fees. 5 In either case, there is a $500,000 cap. 6
The questions presented in these companion cases are whether claims for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Texas Department of Transportation v. City of Sunset ValleyTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Elbaor v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services v. Mega Child Care, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In Re SmithTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. BP America Production Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009
- State Ex Rel. Abbott v. Young, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
- Ex parte SpringsteenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Scott v. Presidio I.S.D., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.