Legal Opinion
City & County of San Francisco v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 1951No. S. F. 18442; S. F. 18443Published
Milton Marks and Milton Marks, Jr., for Respondents.
1Opinion of the Court
38 Cal.2d 156 (1951)
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Petitioners,
v.
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent.
S. F. No. 18442.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Dec. 18, 1951.
Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, and Norman Sanford Wolff, Deputy City Attorney, for Petitioners in S. F. No. 18442.
Frank J. Hennessy and Kay Kimmell, United States Attorneys, William S. Tyson, United States Solicitor, Bessie Margolin, Assistant United States Solicitor, Kenneth C. Robertson, Regional Attorney, James F. Scott, Senior United States Attorney, Fred N. Howser and Edmund…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Rescue Army v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Fortenbury v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- City & County of San Francisco v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.