Legal Opinion

In Re McConnell

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1936No. Crim. 3924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and writ of certiorari ancillary thereto. On December 31, 1928, petitioner was charged in the Superior Court of Contra Costa County with grand theft, a felony, and with two prior convictions of grand larceny. He pleaded guilty to the charge of grand theft, admitted the two prior convictions, and was thereupon adjudged an habitual criminal, and sentenced to life imprisonment at Folsom prison, under the terms of section 644 of the Penal Code.

Petitioner’s theory is that proof of an essential element necessary to adjudge him an habitual…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. DawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. In Re BoatwrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. In Re FontinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re TartarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. People v. NolandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. In Re BertrandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API