MOORE ET UX v. Richfield Oil Corp.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
0 ^CONNELL, J.
This is a suit in equity which plaintiffs, lessors, seek to terminate a lease made with defendant, lessee, and to obtain possession of the leasehold. Plaintiffs assert the right to terminate the lease on the ground that defendant was in default in the payment of the rent beyond the grace period specified in the lease and that the lease was terminated in accordance with its terms. The lease was obtained for the operation of a gasoline filling station. Defendant appeals from a decree terminating the lease and ordering defendant to deliver possession of the premises to plaintiffs.
Th…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rainey v. QuigleyOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Caine v. PowellOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Baker v. LEHREROregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Gould v. HyattOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
3Cited by14 opinions
- Foundation Development Corp. v. Loehmann's, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Fry v. DH Overmyer Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
- State Highway Commission v. DemarestOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Hazen v. Hospitality Associates Inc. (In Re Hospitality Associates Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1980
- Outdoor Systems, Inc. v. BBE, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.