Legal Opinion

Caine v. Powell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1948PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUSK, C. J. †

The purpose of this suit is to obtain relief from the forfeiture of á lease for failure on the. part of the lessees to pay an installment of rent within the time stipulated in the lease. The court entered- a decree in accordance with the prayer of the complaint, and the defendant appeals.

The lease in question was entered into , under date of September 16, 1947, between Marion M. Powell, the defendant, as lessor, and Roy Caine and Rose Caine, husband and wife, the plaintiffs, as lessees. The demised premises comprise space in the Foley Hotel Building in La Grande, Oregon, used for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rainey v. QuigleyOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Welch v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Kopper v. DyerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887
  4. De Wolfe v. KupersOregon Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Foundation Development Corp. v. Loehmann's, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Fry v. DH Overmyer Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State Highway Commission v. DemarestOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Hazen v. Hospitality Associates Inc. (In Re Hospitality Associates Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1980
  5. State v. TaggartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API